Hood v. Mims et al

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING Motion to Dismiss as MOOT 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/27/15. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALBERT LEE HOOD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 1:13-cv-00108-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT (Doc. 24.) MARGARET MIMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Albert Lee Hood (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 19 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed the 20 Complaint commencing this action. (Doc. 1.) The court screened the Complaint and issued an 21 order on May 8, 2014, requiring Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the court 22 of his willingness to proceed only on the Eighth Amendment medical claims found cognizable 23 against defendants Chuna, Taylor, Wibbles, and Zavala (“Defendants”). (Doc. 9.) On June 30, 24 2014, Plaintiff notified the court that he wished to proceed only on the cognizable claims. 25 (Doc. 11.) On September 15, 2014, the court directed the United States Marshal to serve 26 process upon the Defendants. (Doc. 19.) 27 28 On November 19, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 24.) The motion to dismiss is pending. 1 1 On May 26, 2015, with leave of court, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. 2 (Doc. 32.) As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See 3 Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Thus, because the First Amended Complaint 4 has been filed, Plaintiff’s original Complaint no longer serves any function in the case. 5 Therefore, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original Complaint is moot and shall be denied as 6 such. 7 II. 8 9 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed on November 19, 2014, is DENIED as moot. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?