Hood v. Mims et al
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING Motion to Dismiss as MOOT 24 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/27/15. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALBERT LEE HOOD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
1:13-cv-00108-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
(Doc. 24.)
MARGARET MIMS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
I.
BACKGROUND
18
Albert Lee Hood (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil
19
rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed the
20
Complaint commencing this action. (Doc. 1.) The court screened the Complaint and issued an
21
order on May 8, 2014, requiring Plaintiff to either file an amended complaint or notify the court
22
of his willingness to proceed only on the Eighth Amendment medical claims found cognizable
23
against defendants Chuna, Taylor, Wibbles, and Zavala (“Defendants”). (Doc. 9.) On June 30,
24
2014, Plaintiff notified the court that he wished to proceed only on the cognizable claims.
25
(Doc. 11.) On September 15, 2014, the court directed the United States Marshal to serve
26
process upon the Defendants. (Doc. 19.)
27
28
On November 19, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure
to state a claim. (Doc. 24.) The motion to dismiss is pending.
1
1
On May 26, 2015, with leave of court, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint.
2
(Doc. 32.) As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See
3
Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Thus, because the First Amended Complaint
4
has been filed, Plaintiff’s original Complaint no longer serves any function in the case.
5
Therefore, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original Complaint is moot and shall be denied as
6
such.
7
II.
8
9
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to
dismiss, filed on November 19, 2014, is DENIED as moot.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 27, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?