Hood v. Mims et al

Filing 35

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 34 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/29/15. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Case No. 1:13 cv 00108 LJO GSA PC

ALBERT LEE HOOD,
Plaintiff,

9
10

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFTO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

vs.

SGT. TAYLOR, et al.,
Defendants

11

OPPOSITION DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

12
13

On June 5, 2015, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an

14

opposition. The Court will grant Plaintiff a further extension of time in which to file opposition

15

to the motion or a statement of non-opposition. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to do so will

16

result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to obey a court order pursuant to Local Rule

17

110.

18

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted an extension of time

19

of thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file an opposition or statement of

20

non-opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

23
24
25

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1

July 29, 2015