Goolsby v. Cate et al
Filing
72
SCHEDULING ORDER Following Status Conference held on December 11, 2015; ORDER Resolving Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions 58 ; ORDER Denying Defendants' Motion for Court to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant, without Pre judice to Filing All-Inclusive Motion on or Before March 8, 2016 66 ; ORDER Denying Motion for Stay 70 ; ORDER for Parties to Exchange Discovery as Discussed by this Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/15/15. Settlement Conference set for 8/1/2016 at 10:00 AM; Confidential Settlement Conference Statement Date: 7/25/2016. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
THOMAS GOOLSBY,
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
1:13-cv-00119-DAD-EPG-PC
SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING
STATUS CONFERENCE HELD ON
DECEMBER 11, 2015
ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR
SANCTIONS
(ECF No. 58.)
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE
PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING ALLINCLUSIVE MOTION ON OR BEFORE
MARCH 8, 2016
(ECF No. 66.)
14
15
16
17
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY
(ECF No. 70.)
18
19
ORDER FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE
DISCOVERY AS DISCUSSED BY THIS
ORDER
20
21
Settlement Conference:
Monday, August 1, 2016
10:00 a.m.
Settlement Judge TBD
22
23
Confidential Settlement Conference
Statements Due:
July 25, 2016
24
25
26
I.
BACKGROUND
27
Plaintiff, Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
28
forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This action was filed
1
1
on January 25, 2013. (ECF No. 1.) The case now proceeds with the Second Amended
2
Complaint filed on June 6, 2014, on Plaintiff=s Eighth Amendment claims against defendants
3
Warden Kimberly Holland, Warden Michael Stainer, and Captain J. Lundy, for denial of
4
adequate outdoor exercise time; and defendants Captain J. Lundy, Sergeant S. Foster, Plumlee
5
(Maintenance Supervisor), Warden Kimberly Holland, Correctional Officer Jordon, and
6
Correctional Officer Uribe, for deliberate indifference to unsanitary and unsafe conditions.1
7
(ECF No. 34.) The events at issue allegedly occurred at the California Correctional Institution
8
(CCI) in Tehachapi, California, during a thirteen-month period while Plaintiff was incarcerated
9
there in segregated housing.
10
This case is now in the discovery phase, pursuant to the Court’s amended discovery and
11
scheduling order filed on December 8, 2015. (ECF No. 64.) Pending are Plaintiff’s motion to
12
compel filed on November 30, 2015 (ECF No. 58), Defendants’ motion to declare Plaintiff a
13
vexatious litigant filed on December 10, 2015 (ECF No. 66), and Defendants’ motion to stay
14
discovery pending the Court’s ruling on the motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant
15
(ECF No. 70).
16
II.
STATUS CONFERENCE
17
On December 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., a telephonic status conference was held before
18
Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Plaintiff appeared telephonically on his own behalf, and
19
Deputy District Attorney R. Lawrence Bragg appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendants.
20
Discovery
21
The parties discussed discovery for this case, including Plaintiff’s pending motion to
22
compel, and narrowed the discovery to be exchanged between the parties. Defendants agreed
23
to produce (1) copies of policies and procedures in effect at CCI governing inmates’ exercise
24
and prison sanitation issues during the relevant thirteen-month period, including but not limited
25
to copies from CDCR’s Department Operations Manual (DOM) and the CCI supplement to the
26
DOM; (2) any other written documents concerning Plaintiff’s allegations of inadequate
27
28
1
On March 24, 2015, the Court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants from
this action, for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim under § 1983. (ECF No. 36.)
2
1
exercise during the relevant time period, including but not limited to exercise logs, yard
2
records, Administrative Segregation logs and regulations, housing ledger log books, and inmate
3
location/movement logs; (3) any other written documents concerning the overflowing toilets,
4
leaking roof, and presence of mold at issue in this case, including but not limited to memos,
5
requests for repair or assistance, work orders, and documentation of repairs or clean-up.
6
Defendants are not required to produce copies of Title 15 regulations, as Plaintiff indicated that
7
he has access to them. Plaintiff is required to produce any relevant documents that Defendants
8
do not have. Defendants may serve up to five interrogatories to determine what days Plaintiff
9
was not allowed adequate exercise, and what days Plaintiff experienced roof leaks, toilet
10
overflow, and mold. Plaintiff is required to respond to these interrogatories without objections
11
and to provide Defendants with any relevant personal diaries or logs kept by Plaintiff.
12
Defendants agreed to conduct a search of emails sent and received by prison officials
13
concerning roof, toilet, and mold issues at CCI during the relevant time period. Defendants are
14
not required to search back-up records of emails. After the email search, Defendants shall send
15
a letter to Plaintiff informing him of the search made, what was found, and what could not be
16
recovered. The parties should refer to the Court’s December 8, 2015 Scheduling Order for
17
rules and deadlines for conducting discovery.
18
Defendants are not required to respond to any discovery served by Plaintiff before
19
December 11, 2015.
20
Defendants shall use good faith in responding. The Court ordered the parties to alert the Court
21
to any discovery disputes that may arise, before they file a motion to compel.
22
Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant, Motion for Stay
23
The parties discussed Defendants’ pending motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious
24
litigant, filed on December 10, 2015. In light of multiple threshold issues to be decided in this
25
case, Defendants are required to file a new, all-inclusive motion by March 8, 2016, addressing
26
all pending issues not concerning the merits of this case, such as the vexatious litigant issue,
27
exhaustion of remedies, statutes of limitations, and the requirements for Plaintiff to bring tort
28
claims. Defendants’ pending motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant shall be denied
However, Plaintiff may serve narrowed requests if reasonable, and
3
1
without prejudice to filing the all-inclusive motion.
2
discovery in this action.
The Court found no good cause to stay
3
Settlement Conference
4
In anticipation of settlement proceedings at a later stage of the case, a Settlement
5
Conference was scheduled for August 1, 2016, to be held before Magistrate Judge Grosjean or
6
another Magistrate Judge. Defense counsel agreed to consult with Defendants to determine if
7
they are agreeable to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean presiding over the Settlement
8
Conference, and to report back to the Court within three weeks by contacting Courtroom
9
Deputy Amanda Martinez.
If Plaintiff wishes to request a settlement judge other than
10
Magistrate Judge Grosjean, Plaintiff shall notify the Court within three weeks by sending a
11
letter to the Court. The parties’ confidential settlement conference statements shall be due one
12
week before the settlement conference, no later than July 25, 2016.
13
III.
14
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1.
16
Plaintiff’s motion to compel and for sanctions, filed on November 30, 2015, is
RESOLVED;
17
2.
Defendants’ motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant, filed on December
18
10, 2015, is DENIED, without prejudice to filing an all-inclusive motion by
19
March 8, 2015, as discussed in this order;
20
3.
21
is DENIED;
22
4.
23
The parties are ordered to exchange reasonable discovery as instructed by this
order;
24
5.
25
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for August 1, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., before
a United States Magistrate Judge;
26
6.
27
28
Defendants’ motion to stay discovery in this action, filed on December 10, 2015,
The parties shall submit settlement conference statements one week before the
Settlement Conference, no later than July 25, 2016;
///
4
1
7.
Within three weeks of the date of this order, Defense Counsel shall report back
2
to Courtroom Deputy Amanda Martinez after consulting with Defendants to
3
determine if they are agreeable to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean presiding
4
over the Settlement Conference; and
5
8.
If Plaintiff wishes to request a settlement judge other than Magistrate Judge
6
Erica P. Grosjean, Plaintiff shall notify the Court within three weeks of the date
7
of this order by sending a letter to the Court.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 15, 2015
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?