Gutierrez v. Asset Management Specialist Inc.

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue the Scheduling Conference and Deadline to Submit Joint Scheduling Report signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/21/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/2/2013 is CONTINUED to 6/12/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The joint scheduling report shall be filed one week prior to the conference. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 Jeremy T. Naftel, State Bar No. 185215 jnaftel@cdflaborlaw.com 2 Joel Van Parys, State Bar No. 227387 jvanparys@cdflaborlaw.com 3 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP 900 University Avenue 4 Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 5 Telephone: (916) 361-0991 Facsimile: (916) 570-1958 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC. 8 Daniel F. Gaines, State Bar No. 251488 daniel@gaineslawfirm.com 9 Alex P. Katofsky, State Bar No. 202754 alex@gaineslawfirm.com 10 GAINES & GAINES, APLC 21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 980 11 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 703-8985 12 Facsimile: (818) 703-8984 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others 14 similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO 17 18 JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the 19 general public, 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC., a ) Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT 25 It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their counsel of record, as follows: 26 1. On January 31, 2013 this Court ordered the parties to appear for a mandatory 27 scheduling conference. The Court also ordered the parties to submit a joint scheduling report one 28 week before the scheduling conference. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name. 1 2. The parties have been conducting informal discovery and have agreed to participate 2 in a mediation. The parties are finalizing a mediation date in mid to late May, 2013. 3 3. Because the parties have participated in informal discovery and agreed to mediate 4 the case, and in the interest of saving time and expense for the parties and the Court, they jointly 5 request that the Court order: (1) that the status conference currently set for April 2, 2013 be 6 continued to a date no earlier than June 3 and no later than June 27, 2013 and (2) that the date to 7 submit a Joint Status Report be continued to the date 7 days prior to the new status conference. 8 9 Dated: March, 20, 2013 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP Joel Van Parys 10 11 By: /s/Joel Van Parys Joel Van Parys Attorneys for Defendant ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC. 12 13 14 15 Dated: March 20, 2013 GAINES & GAINES, APLC 16 17 18 19 By: /s/Daniel F. Gaines Daniel F. Gaines Attorneys for Plaintiff JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name. 1 ORDER In light of the parties’ stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for April 2 3 2, 2013, is continued to June 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. The joint scheduling report shall be filed one 4 week prior to the conference. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: March 21, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 12 6i0kij8d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?