Gutierrez v. Asset Management Specialist Inc.
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue the Scheduling Conference and Deadline to Submit Joint Scheduling Report signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/21/2013. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/2/2013 is CONTINUED to 6/12/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin. The joint scheduling report shall be filed one week prior to the conference. (Martinez, A)
1 Jeremy T. Naftel, State Bar No. 185215
jnaftel@cdflaborlaw.com
2 Joel Van Parys, State Bar No. 227387
jvanparys@cdflaborlaw.com
3 CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
900 University Avenue
4 Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
5 Telephone: (916) 361-0991
Facsimile: (916) 570-1958
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.
8 Daniel F. Gaines, State Bar No. 251488
daniel@gaineslawfirm.com
9 Alex P. Katofsky, State Bar No. 202754
alex@gaineslawfirm.com
10 GAINES & GAINES, APLC
21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 980
11 Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: (818) 703-8985
12 Facsimile: (818) 703-8984
13 Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others
14 similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
17
18 JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the
19 general public,
20
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC., a )
Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 through 10,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 1:13-CV-00149-LJO-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND DEADLINE TO
SUBMIT JOINT SCHEDULING
REPORT
25
It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their counsel of record, as follows:
26
1.
On January 31, 2013 this Court ordered the parties to appear for a mandatory
27 scheduling conference. The Court also ordered the parties to submit a joint scheduling report one
28 week before the scheduling conference.
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE
Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name.
1
2.
The parties have been conducting informal discovery and have agreed to participate
2 in a mediation. The parties are finalizing a mediation date in mid to late May, 2013.
3
3.
Because the parties have participated in informal discovery and agreed to mediate
4 the case, and in the interest of saving time and expense for the parties and the Court, they jointly
5 request that the Court order: (1) that the status conference currently set for April 2, 2013 be
6 continued to a date no earlier than June 3 and no later than June 27, 2013 and (2) that the date to
7 submit a Joint Status Report be continued to the date 7 days prior to the new status conference.
8
9 Dated: March, 20, 2013
CAROTHERS DISANTE & FREUDENBERGER LLP
Joel Van Parys
10
11
By:
/s/Joel Van Parys
Joel Van Parys
Attorneys for Defendant
ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST, INC.
12
13
14
15 Dated: March 20, 2013
GAINES & GAINES, APLC
16
17
18
19
By:
/s/Daniel F. Gaines
Daniel F. Gaines
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESUS GUTIERREZ, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE
Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name.
1
ORDER
In light of the parties’ stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for April
2
3 2, 2013, is continued to June 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. The joint scheduling report shall be filed one
4 week prior to the conference.
5
6
7
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
March 21, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
12 6i0kij8d
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
THE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE
Error! Unknown document property name..Error! Unknown document property name.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?