Summers v. Chapnick et.al.

Filing 33

ORDER Adopting 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending to Dismiss Certain Claims signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/22/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GEORGE EDWARD SUMMERS, Case No. 1:13-cv-00190 LJO DLB PC 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ORDER ADOPING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS R. CHAPNICK, et al., 13 ECF No. 32 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff George Edward Summers (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's complaint, filed November 13, 2012. (ECF No. 14.) On August 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations recommending dismissing certain claims. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 This action proceed on Plaintiff's complaint, filed November 13, 2012, against Defendants Biol and Siegresit for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the 1 1 2 3 4 5 Eighth Amendment; 2. Plaintiff's remaining claims and defendants are dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim; and 3. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to initiate service of process proceedings. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill September 22, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?