Rowe v. Copenhaver

Filing 4

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-220 AC) to Fresno (1:13-cv-219 GSA) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/11/13. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 OMAR ROWE, Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0220 AC P PAUL COPENHAVER, Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his application, petitioner challenges the 19 Bureau of Prisons’ computation of his pre-trial and post-sentencing time credits. Petitioner is 20 confined in Merced County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District 21 Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 22 23 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 24 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 25 court. 26 //// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern 3 District of California sitting in Fresno; and 4 5 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 6 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 7 8 9 DATED: February 11, 2013. 10 11 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 AC:009/kly rowe0220.109 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?