Rowe v. Copenhaver

Filing 7

ORDER REQUIRING Petitioner to SUBMIT Signed Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/7/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OMAR ROWE, 1:13-CV-00219 GSA HC 13 Petitioner, 14 ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION v. 15 PAUL COPENHAVER, 16 Respondent. 17 / 18 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He has consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 21 Upon a close examination of the petition submitted to the Court, the Court has discovered 22 that the petition does not contain an original signature. Local Rule 131 requires a document 23 submitted to the Court for filing to include an original signature. In addition, Rule 2 of the Rules 24 Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a petition for writ of habeas corpus to “be signed under 25 penalty of perjury by the petitioner.” 26 In light of the difficulty in having Petitioner submit a new habeas corpus petition, Petitioner 27 is ORDERED to submit a document stating that he submitted the instant petition to the Court and 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia cd 1 1 sign it under penalty of perjury. The document should contain an original signature. Petitioner is 2 GRANTED twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order to comply with the Court’s 3 directive. 4 5 Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with a Court order will result in dismissal of the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 6i0kij March 7, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia cd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?