Rowe v. Copenhaver
Filing
7
ORDER REQUIRING Petitioner to SUBMIT Signed Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/7/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OMAR ROWE,
1:13-CV-00219 GSA HC
13
Petitioner,
14
ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO
SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION
v.
15
PAUL COPENHAVER,
16
Respondent.
17
/
18
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He has consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant
20
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
21
Upon a close examination of the petition submitted to the Court, the Court has discovered
22
that the petition does not contain an original signature. Local Rule 131 requires a document
23
submitted to the Court for filing to include an original signature. In addition, Rule 2 of the Rules
24
Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a petition for writ of habeas corpus to “be signed under
25
penalty of perjury by the petitioner.”
26
In light of the difficulty in having Petitioner submit a new habeas corpus petition, Petitioner
27
is ORDERED to submit a document stating that he submitted the instant petition to the Court and
28
U .S. D istrict C ourt
E. D . C alifornia
cd
1
1
sign it under penalty of perjury. The document should contain an original signature. Petitioner is
2
GRANTED twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order to comply with the Court’s
3
directive.
4
5
Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with a Court order will result in dismissal of
the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
6i0kij
March 7, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
U .S. D istrict C ourt
E. D . C alifornia
cd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?