Dixon v. The State of California et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal as to Defendants State of California (a government entity) and Department of Transportation (a government entity) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/19/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RONALD W. BEALS, Chief Counsel JEANNE SCHERER, Deputy Chief Counsel DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON, Assistant Chief Counsel BRUCE D. McGAGIN, Attorney Bar No. 170146 PETER WINSLOW, Attorney Bar No. 085345 peter_winslow@dot.ca.gov 1120 N Street (MS 57) P.O. Box 1438 Sacramento, California 95812-1438 Telephone: (916) 654-2630 Facsimile: (916) 654-6128 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant, State of California, Department of Transportation 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MAGEELA DIXON, an Individual ) CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00244-AWI-GSA ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and ) ORDER Plaintiffs. ) vs. ) THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a ) government entity; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ) a/k/a CALTRANS, a government entity; ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION a/k/a AMTRAK, a ) corporation; BARBARA ANN NEU, an ) individual; BNSF, a corporation; YOUNG’S ) COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC., a ) corporation; JIMENEZ TRUCKING, a ) corporation; RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ ) JIMENEZ, an Individual; and DOES 1 through ) 100, Inclusive, ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ) 25 26 27 /// /// /// 28 -1- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL: 2 It is stipulated by the parties to the above-entitled action, by their respective attorneys of record, 3 that the action be dismissed as to Defendant State of California, Department of Transportation, and 4 without prejudice to either party and that an order to that effect accordingly may be made and entered 5 without further notice. 6 Respectfully submitted, THE VARTAZARIAN LAW FIRM 7 8 Dated: ____________ By: ________________________________________ Erol D. Ari Attorney for Plaintiff, Mageela Dixon Dated: ____________ By: _______________________________________ Peter K. Winslow Attorneys for Defendant State of California by and through the Department of Transportation 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER: 2 It is now ordered that the above-entitled action is dismissed as to Defendant State of California, 3 Department of Transportation, without prejudice to either party. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: July 19, 2013 8 9 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 0m8i788 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?