Dixon v. The State of California et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal as to Defendants State of California (a government entity) and Department of Transportation (a government entity) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/19/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

RONALD W. BEALS, Chief Counsel
JEANNE SCHERER, Deputy Chief Counsel
DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON, Assistant Chief Counsel
BRUCE D. McGAGIN, Attorney Bar No. 170146
PETER WINSLOW, Attorney Bar No. 085345
[e-mail]
1120 N Street (MS 57) P.O. Box 1438
Sacramento, California 95812-1438
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant,
State of California, Department of Transportation

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MAGEELA DIXON, an Individual

) CASE NO. 1:13-CV-00244-AWI-GSA
)
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and
) ORDER
Plaintiffs.
)
vs.
)
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a
)
government entity; STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION )
a/k/a CALTRANS, a government entity;
)
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
)
CORPORATION a/k/a AMTRAK, a
)
corporation; BARBARA ANN NEU, an
)
individual; BNSF, a corporation; YOUNG’S )
COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC., a
)
corporation; JIMENEZ TRUCKING, a
)
corporation; RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ
)
JIMENEZ, an Individual; and DOES 1 through )
100, Inclusive,
)
)
DEFENDANTS.
)
)

25
26
27

///
///
///

28

-1-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL:

2

It is stipulated by the parties to the above-entitled action, by their respective attorneys of record,

3

that the action be dismissed as to Defendant State of California, Department of Transportation, and

4

without prejudice to either party and that an order to that effect accordingly may be made and entered

5

without further notice.

6

Respectfully submitted,
THE VARTAZARIAN LAW FIRM

7
8

Dated: ____________

By:

________________________________________
Erol D. Ari
Attorney for Plaintiff, Mageela Dixon

Dated: ____________

By:

_______________________________________
Peter K. Winslow
Attorneys for Defendant State of California
by and through the Department of Transportation

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

ORDER:

2

It is now ordered that the above-entitled action is dismissed as to Defendant State of California,

3

Department of Transportation, without prejudice to either party.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: July 19, 2013

8
9

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and [PROPOSED] ORDER