Armstrong v. Spearman, et al.

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/05/2014. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

13
14
15
16

CASE NO. 1:13-CV-246 AWI SAB (PC)

Plaintiff
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION

v.
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

(Doc. Nos. 15, 16, 18)
Defendants

17
18

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

19

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 8, 2013 and July 10, 2013, Plaintiff filed two

20

motions that in essence seek a preliminary injunction. See Doc. Nos. 15, 16.

21

The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

22

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 27, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings

23

and Recommendations (F&&R) that recommended denying Plaintiff’s motions. See Doc. No. 18.

24

The F&R, which was served on Plaintiff, contained notice that Objections to the F&R were to be

25

filed within thirty days. No Objections were filed.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

27

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the F&R to

28

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1
2

1.

adopted in full; and

3
4
5

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 27, 2013, (Doc. No. 18) is

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. Nos.

15, 16) are DENIED.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2