Armstrong v. Spearman, et al.

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 38 39 Motions for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/8/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BRADY K. ARMSTRONG, 9 10 11 Plaintiff, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [ECF Nos. 38, 39] 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time. (ECF No. 38.) A verbatim copy of the motion was again filed on May 7, 2014. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff requests an extension of time to respond to all court orders. Plaintiff is advised that 20 there are currently no deadlines pending for which a response is due by Plaintiff. Accordingly, 21 Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 8, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?