Armstrong v. Spearman, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER Regarding Ex Parte Communication With Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/20/2014. If Plaintiff wishes an issue to be heard and addressed by the Court, he must file an appropriate motion relating to such matter. After the m otion is deemed submitted under Local Rule 230(l), the Court will rule on such motion. If Plaintiff is uncertain as to any applicable rules and/or procedures, he is directed to review the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California available at this Courts website, www.caed.uscourts.gov. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB (PC)
)
)
) ORDER REGARDING EX PARTE
COMMUNICATION WITH COURT
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
To date, the Court has received two telephone calls to the undersigned chambers from Plaintiff.

19
20

Plaintiff is instructed to refrain from communicating with the Court ex parte regarding any matter

21

involving his case. If Plaintiff wishes an issue to be heard and addressed by the Court, he must file an

22

appropriate motion relating to such matter. After the motion is deemed submitted under Local Rule

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

230(l), the Court will rule on such motion. If Plaintiff is uncertain as to any applicable rules and/or

2

procedures, he is directed to review the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern

3

District of California available at this Court’s website, www.caed.uscourts.gov.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 20, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2