Armstrong v. Spearman, et al.

Filing 50

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration And/Or Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 45 , 46 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/4/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:13-cv-00246-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND/OR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 45, 46]

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On June 16, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 9, 2014,

20

order denying his request for an extension of time as unnecessary. Plaintiff contends that prison

21

officials have withheld his legal property after he paroled from prison on April 18, 2014. Plaintiff

22

seeks a court order directing the return of his legal property.

23

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

24

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 30, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

25

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that

26

Objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within twenty days. No Objections

27

were filed.

28

///
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

2

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

3

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 30, 2014, is adopted in full; and

6

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and/or request for a preliminary injunction is

7

DENIED.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 4, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2