Gutierrez v. Chock et al

Filing 21

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/17/2013. The Court ORDERS the parties, no later than August 22, 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ, 5 CASE NO. CV F 13-0261 LJO GSA Plaintiff, 6 ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 20.) vs. 7 8 VICTOR CHOCK, et al., Defendants. 9 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff=s counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. Pursuant to this Court=s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later 14 than August 22, 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its 15 16 entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. 17 This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the August 5, 2013 18 scheduling conference, which is subject to immediate resetting if settlement is not completed 19 timely. 20 Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on 21 22 23 24 25 counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must obey the Federal Rules of /// /// 26 /// 27 28 /// 1 1 2 Civil Procedure and this Court=s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 11 DEAC_Signature-END: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill 12 July 17, 2013 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 66h44d 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?