Tung v. Brown et al

Filing 26

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 25 Application to Proceed IFP as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/23/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

BALWINDER SINGH TUNG,

11
12

1:13-cv-00269-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS AS MOOT
(ECF NO. 25)

Plaintiff,
v.

13

EDMUND G. BROWN, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17

Balwinder Singh Tung (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma

18

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is currently on appeal.

19

(ECF Nos. 21 & 22). On January 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma

20

pauperis. (ECF No. 25). The Court will deny the application because Plaintiff is already

21

proceeding in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4). Therefore, Plaintiff’s current application is moot.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is
DENIED as moot.

24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26

Dated:

January 23, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1