Tung v. Brown et al

Filing 26

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 25 Application to Proceed IFP as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/23/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BALWINDER SINGH TUNG, 11 12 1:13-cv-00269-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT (ECF NO. 25) Plaintiff, v. 13 EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Balwinder Singh Tung (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro per and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is currently on appeal. 19 (ECF Nos. 21 & 22). On January 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis. (ECF No. 25). The Court will deny the application because Plaintiff is already 21 proceeding in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4). Therefore, Plaintiff’s current application is moot. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: January 23, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?