Nawabi v. Cates et al

Filing 52

ORDER RE: STIPULATION to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docs. 45 , 51 ), Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/1/2015. The Motion Hearing now set for 4/15/2015 at 10:00 AM is CONTINUED to 4/29/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff's opposition papers shall be filed on or before 4/15/2015. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed on or before 4/22/2015. (Arellano, S.)

Download PDF
5 Mark A. Ozzello (CSB #116595) Suzy E. Lee (CSB #271120) ARIAS, OZZELLO & GIGNAC, LLP 6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90045 Telephone: (310) 670-1600 Facsimile: (310) 670-1231 mozzello@aogllp.com slee@aogllp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IDRIS NAWABI, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. CASE NO.: 1:13-cv-00272-LJOSAB CLASS ACTION ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., TO CONTINUE THE HEARING GOVERNOR; JEFFREY BEARD, ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DISMISS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION (CDCR); JAMES D. HARTLEY, WARDEN OF THE AVENAL STATE PRISON (ASP); R. CHAPNICK, ASP CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, M.D.; B. BORGES, ASP REGISTERED NURSE; HANCOCK, ASP CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #45] is continued to April 29, 2015; 5 2. 6 Plaintiffs’ opposition papers shall be filed on or before April 15, 2015; and 7 3. 8 Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed on or before April 22, 2015. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?