Nawabi v. Cates et al
Filing
52
ORDER RE: STIPULATION to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docs. 45 , 51 ), Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/1/2015. The Motion Hearing now set for 4/15/2015 at 10:00 AM is CONTINUED to 4/29/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff's opposition papers shall be filed on or before 4/15/2015. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed on or before 4/22/2015. (Arellano, S.)
5
Mark A. Ozzello (CSB #116595)
Suzy E. Lee (CSB #271120)
ARIAS, OZZELLO & GIGNAC, LLP
6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90045
Telephone: (310) 670-1600
Facsimile: (310) 670-1231
mozzello@aogllp.com
slee@aogllp.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IDRIS NAWABI,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
CASE NO.: 1:13-cv-00272-LJOSAB
CLASS ACTION
ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.,
TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
GOVERNOR; JEFFREY BEARD,
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DISMISS
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION (CDCR);
JAMES D. HARTLEY, WARDEN OF
THE AVENAL STATE PRISON (ASP);
R. CHAPNICK, ASP CHIEF MEDICAL
OFFICER, M.D.; B. BORGES, ASP
REGISTERED NURSE; HANCOCK,
ASP CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
1
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that:
3
1.
4
The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #45] is
continued to April 29, 2015;
5
2.
6
Plaintiffs’ opposition papers shall be filed on or before April 15,
2015; and
7
3.
8
Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed on or before April 22,
2015.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 1, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?