Nawabi v. Cates et al
Filing
59
ORDER re 58 Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations and to Extend the Page Limit for Objections signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/1/2015. Objections to F&R due by 6/17/2015. Responses to Objections due by 7/8/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600
Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903
8
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12 IDRIS NAWABI ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER
v.
15 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.,
16
Case No. 1:13-cv- 00272-LJO-SAB
GOVERNOR; JEFFREY BEARD,
SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION (“CDCR”);
JAMES D. HARTLEY, WARDEN OF
THE AVENAL STATE PRISON
(“ASP”); R. CHAPNICK, ASP CHIEF
MEDICAL OFFICER, M.D.; B.
BORGES, ASP REGISTERED
NURSE; HANCOCK, ASP
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ,
Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
1
2
The Court has reviewed the stipulation of the parties and finds good cause to
3 extend the deadline to file objections to the Magistrate’s Findings and
4 Recommendations (Doc. 56), as well as extend the page limit for those objections,
5 and thus Orders as follows:
6
(1) The deadline to file any objections to the Magistrate’s Findings and
7 Recommendations (Doc. 56) shall be June 17, 2015;
8
(2) The objections shall be no more than thirty-five (35) pages in length,
9 excluding tables of contents and authorities;
21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600
Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903
10
(3) The deadline to file responses to objections to the Magistrate’s Findings
11 and Recommendations (Doc. 56) shall be July 8, 2015.
12
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
June 1, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?