Nawabi v. Cates et al

Filing 74

ORDER LIFTING STAY and Requiring Plaintiff to File a Third Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/4/19. (Third Amended Complaint due 14-Day Dealine)(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IDRIS NAWABI, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-00272-LJO-SAB ORDER LIFTING STAY AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT v. CATES, et al., FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Idis Nawabi, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 18 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 on February 25, 2013. On November 19 30, 2015, this matter was stayed at the stipulation of the parties until the resolution of the appeals 20 in Smith, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., appeal no. 15-17155, Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 1521 16145, and Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076. 22 On February 1, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued an order affirming the district court 23 decision in Smith, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., appeal no. 15-17155, and Hines v. Youssef, 24 appeal no. 15-16145, and affirming in part and reversing in part in Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et 25 al., appeal no. 15-17076. Plaintiffs filed requests for en banc review which were denied on 26 March 26, 2019. On April 3, 2019, the mandate issued in each of the actions. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The stay in this matter is lifted; and 1 2. 1 Plaintiff shall file a third amended complaint alleging his Eighth Amendment 2 deliberate indifference to medical care claims within fourteen (14) days of the 3 date of entry of this order. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: April 4, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?