Henderson v. Smith et al

Filing 16

ORDER Disregarding Motion to Withdraw as Moot 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/25/13. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, 12 1:13-cv-00287-LJO-GSA-PC Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MOOT (Doc. 15.) SMITH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Curtis Lee Henderson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 27, 2013. 19 (Doc. 1.) 20 On June 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to submit a copy of 21 his prison trust account statement. (Doc. 11.) On June 27, 2013, the court issued an order 22 granting Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 12.) Also on June 27, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a copy of his 23 prison trust account statement. (Doc. 13.) 24 25 On July 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his motion for extension of time, based on the fact that he submitted the trust account statement on June 27, 2013. (Doc. 15.) 26 Plaintiff is advised that his motion to withdraw is moot, because the motion for 27 extension of time was resolved when it was granted. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw 28 shall be disregarded as moot. 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw, filed on July 23, 2013, is DISREGARDED 1 2 as moot. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7 8 9 July 25, 2013 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 6i0kij8d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?