Henderson v. Smith et al
Filing
16
ORDER Disregarding Motion to Withdraw as Moot 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/25/13. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON,
12
1:13-cv-00287-LJO-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW AS MOOT
(Doc. 15.)
SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Curtis Lee Henderson ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
18
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 27, 2013.
19
(Doc. 1.)
20
On June 24, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to submit a copy of
21
his prison trust account statement. (Doc. 11.) On June 27, 2013, the court issued an order
22
granting Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 12.) Also on June 27, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a copy of his
23
prison trust account statement. (Doc. 13.)
24
25
On July 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his motion for extension of time,
based on the fact that he submitted the trust account statement on June 27, 2013. (Doc. 15.)
26
Plaintiff is advised that his motion to withdraw is moot, because the motion for
27
extension of time was resolved when it was granted. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw
28
shall be disregarded as moot.
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw, filed on July 23, 2013, is DISREGARDED
1
2
as moot.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
7
8
9
July 25, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?