Henderson v. Smith et al
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That This Action Be Dismissed, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/20/14: Objections, if any, due in thirty days. (Hellings, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR.,
SMITH, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION
BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON
WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN THIRTY
Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr. (“Plaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
commencing this action on February 27, 2013. (Doc. 1.)
On May 8, 2014, the Court dismissed Plaintiff=s Complaint for failure to state a claim,
with leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A; 28 U.S.C. '
1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court=s order.
As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A
and 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e), this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff=s failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, and that this dismissal be
subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658
F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(l). Within thirty
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written
objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v.
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 20, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?