Herrera v. Rouch

Filing 39

ORDER Adopting 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 21 25 Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/13/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12

ROBERTO HERRERA,

13

Case No. 1:13-cv-00289-LJO-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS
FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ROUCH,
ECF Nos. 21, 25, and 29

16

Defendant.

17
18

Plaintiff Roberto Herrera, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed

19 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 27, 2013. The matter was
20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
21 Rule 302.
22

On December 16, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations

23 recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied, without
24 prejudice. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff filed objections on January 6, 2014. (ECF No. 35.)
25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28

1

1 analysis.
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

1.

and

4
5
6
7
8

The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 16, 2013, are adopted in full

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 21 and 25) are

DENIED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 13, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9

3.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2