Burton v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Filing
77
ORDER GRANTING 75 Joint Request to Seal Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/4/2014. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
DENNIS BURTON, on behalf of himself and )
all others similar situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE LLC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
Case No.: 1:13-cv-00307 LJO JLT
ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS
(Doc. 75)
16
Before Court is the amended request, lodged by Defendants to seal portions of the Exhibit A
17
18
which with is attached to the declaration of Erik Kemp. Plaintiff joins in this request. For the reasons
19
set forth below, the request is GRANTED.
20
I.
21
Legal Authority
The request to seal documents is controlled by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The
22
Rule permits the Court to issue orders to “protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment,
23
oppression, or undue burden or expense, including . . . requiring that a trade secret or other
24
confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in
25
a specified way.” Only if good cause exists may the Court seal the information from public view after
26
balancing “the needs for discovery against the need for confidentiality.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors
27
Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. Cal. 2010) (quoting Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors
28
Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2002)).
1
1
Generally, documents filed in civil cases are presumed to be available to the public. EEOC v.
2
Erection Co., 900 F.2d 168, 170 (9th Cir. 1990); see also Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu,
3
447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.2006); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1134 (9th
4
Cir.2003). Documents may be sealed only when the compelling reasons for doing so outweigh the
5
public’s right of access. EEOC at 170. In evaluating the request, the Court considers the “public
6
interest in understanding the judicial process and whether disclosure of the material could result in
7
improper use of the material for scandalous or libelous purposes or infringement upon trade secrets.”
8
Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States District Court, 798 F.2d 1289, 1294 (9th Cir. 1986).
Here, the parties seek sealing of documents related to Plaintiff’s tax returns, including his
9
10
social security number and that of his wife and other personal identifiers, such as dates of birth.
11
Public disclosure of this information could subject the parties to fraud and would unnecessarily reveal
12
private information. Premium Serv. Corp. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 511 F.2d 225, 229 (9th Cir.
13
1975) (“[A] public policy against unnecessary public disclosure arises from the need, if the tax laws
14
are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns.”); Gabel v.
15
C.I.R., 134 F.3d 377 (9th Cir. 1998) (Social security numbers are part of tax return information and
16
are confidential.) Thus, the Court finds a compelling need for this information to remain private.
Likewise, the parties seek to file under seal Plaintiff’s credit report. This report contains
17
18
information that, as with the tax returns, could subject the parties to fraudulent use of this “highly
19
personal” information and there is no public interest in disclosure of this information. The Court finds
20
this information is of the type that “traditionally been kept secret for important policy reasons.”
21
Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 quoting Times Mirror Co. v. United States, 873 F.2d 1210, 1219 (9th Cir.
22
1989). Therefore, the Court finds a compelling need for this information not to be disclosed to the
23
public.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
ORDER
2
Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:
3
1.
Defendants’ request to seal (Doc. 75) is GRANTED.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 4, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?