Burton v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Filing 88

ORDER SETTING Further Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/6/2014. Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2014 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Appearances via CourtCall are authorized. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS BURTON et al., 12 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-CV-00307 LJO JLT ORDER SETTING FURTHER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Because this case has been scheduled only through class related activities—and these have now been completed—the Court ORDERS: 1. The Court sets a further scheduling conference on December 17, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. Telephonic appearances via the CourtCall service are authorized; 2. No later than December 10, 2014, counsel SHALL file a joint further scheduling conference report which SHALL include a discussion of the following issues: 23 a. Any proposed amendment to the pleadings presently on file; 24 b. A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings; 25 c. Whether additional discovery is needed as to Plaintiff’s individual claims and, if so, a 26 proposed deadline to complete this discovery; 27 d. 28 individual claims and, if so, deadlines by which experts must be disclosed and discovery Whether either party anticipates using the services of an expert as to Plaintiff’s 1 1 completed as to experts; 2 e. 3 Plaintiff’s individual claims. Dispositive motions must be filed at least seven weeks before the 4 pretrial conference and non-dispositive motions must be filed at least six weeks before the 5 dispositive motions unless the parties determine that the dispositive motion would not be 6 impacted by any ruling on the nondispositive motions; 7 f. An estimate of the number of trial days required; 8 g. The proposed trial date that should be at least 24 weeks after the close of discovery, if 9 any; The deadline by which non-dispostive and dispositive motions will be filed related to 10 h. 11 trial date; 12 i. 13 and address the issue of whether they are willing to consent to the jurisdiction of a U.S. 14 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(c). 15 j. 16 shortening or expediting discovery, pre−trial motions or trial. 17 k. 18 including any bankruptcy court. 19 l. 20 JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 21 m. 22 /// 28 Any other matters counsel wish to bring to the Court’s attention. /// 27 Joint Scheduling Reports are to be emailed, in Word format, to /// 26 Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any other court, /// 25 Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial, or any other suggestion for /// 24 Because the District Judges’ dockets are extremely crowded, the parties should consider /// 23 The proposed pretrial conference date which should be at least eight weeks before the /// 2 1 SHOULD COUNSEL OR A PARTY APPEARING PRO SE FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE 2 FURTHER MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, OR FAIL TO COMPLY WITH 3 THE DIRECTIONS AS SET FORTH ABOVE, AN EX PARTE HEARING MAY BE HELD 4 AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL, DEFAULT, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT 5 MAY BE ENTERED, INCLUDING SANCTIONS AND CONTEMPT OF COURT. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?