Kietty v. Walker et al

Filing 30

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion Direct Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/19/14. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 HUSSEIN ALI KIETTY, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. A. WALKER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00312-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DIRECT DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF No. 29] 13 14 15 Plaintiff Hussein Ali Kietty is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 17 On November 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court to direct Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s amended complaint. 18 19 Plaintiff correctly points out that on October 7, 2014, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s first amended complaint within thirty days from the date of service. 20 On November 5, 2014, Defendants timely filed an answer to the first amended complaint. 21 Because Defendants responded timely to Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, Plaintiff’s present 22 motion must be DENIED. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?