Kietty v. Walker et al

Filing 87

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 84 Plaintiff's Motion for Filing Investigative Claim Under Witness Testimony and Vacating Trial Preparation signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/30/2016. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUSSEIN ALI KIETTY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. A. WALKER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00312-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FILING INVESTIGATIVE CLAIM UNDER WITNESS TESTIMONY AND VACATING TRIAL PREPARATION [ECF No. 84] Plaintiff Hussein Ali Kietty is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the 19 jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 302. 20 On November 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled “Motion Filing For Investigative 21 Claim Under Witness Testimony and Relief Vacating Trial Preparation Under Attorney General for 22 Department of Corrections Continuance With Investigation.” Plaintiff seeks to a continuance of the 23 trial dates set forth in District Judge Drozd’s second scheduling order issued October 3, 2016. Judge 24 Drozd’s second scheduling order was vacated on November 22, 2016, when the action was referred 25 and reassigned to the undersigned 26 A hearing was held on this matter on November 29, 2016 at the Trial Scheduling Conference. 27 Hussein Ali Kietty appeared telephonically in pro per and Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy 28 Attorney General, also appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendants. 1 In light of the Plaintiff comments at the hearing, the Court found no need for the Defendants to 1 2 file an opposition. For the reasons stated on the record, the Plaintiff motion is denied as MOOT. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 November 30, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?