Vlasich v. Nareddy et al
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER for this Action to Proceed only Against Defendants Dr. Beregovskaya and Dr. Nareddy on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Medical Claims; ORDER Dismissing all other Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/03/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVEN VLASICH,
12
13
14
1:13-cv-00326-LJO-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 21.)
vs.
ORDER FOR THIS ACTION TO
PROCEED ONLY AGAINST
DEFENDANTS DR. BEREGOVSKAYA
AND DR. NAREDDY ON PLAINTIFF’S
EIGHTH AMENDMENT MEDICAL
CLAIMS
DR. NAREDDY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
ORDER DISMISSING ALL OTHER
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
18
19
20
Steven Vlasich (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
21
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case now proceeds on the Second
22
Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on August 18, 2014. (ECF No. 17.) The matter was
23
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
24
Rule 302.
25
On October 27, 2015, the Court entered Findings and Recommendations,
26
recommending that this action proceed only against defendants Dr. Beregovskaya and Dr.
27
Nareddy on Plaintiff=s medical claims, and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed
28
from this action based on Plaintiff=s failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff was
1
1
provided an opportunity to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations within twenty
2
days.
3
Recommendations.
To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the Findings and
4
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
5
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
6
the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
7
analysis.
8
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
9
1.
10
11
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October
27, 2015, are ADOPTED in full;
2.
This action now proceeds with Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, filed on
12
August 18, 2014, against defendants Dr. Beregovskaya and Dr. Nareddy, on
13
Plaintiff=s medical claims;
14
3.
All remaining claims and defendants are DISMISSED from this action;
15
4.
Defendants Dr. C. McCabe, Dr. J. Wong, Dr. Williams, Nurse Kayun, and
16
Nurse B. Morean are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice based on
17
Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted against
18
them; and
19
5.
20
The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of defendants McCabe, Wong,
Williams, Kayun, and Morean from this action on the Court's docket.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
December 3, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?