Vlasich v. Nareddy et al

Filing 52

ORDER Granting Defendants' Ex Parte Request for Leave to File Reply in Excess of 10 Page Limit re 49 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/2/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
STEVEN VLASICH,
9
10
v.
11
12

Case No. 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
REPLY IN EXCESS OF 10 PAGE LIMIT
(ECF NO. 49)

DR. C. NAREDDY and DR. O. B
EREGOVSKAYA,

13
Defendants.
14
15

On March 7, 2017, the defendants in this case filed a motion for summary judgment.

16

(ECF No. 41). On April 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 48). On

17

May 1, 2017, the defendants filed this ex parte request for leave to file a reply in excess of the 10

18

page limit set by the Court’s standing order. (ECF No. 49). The defendants state that they need

19

up to twenty-five pages to address Plaintiff’s opposition because it is forty-two pages, and

20

includes an additional “208 or so pages of ‘evidence.’” (Id.).
The Court will grant the defendants’ request. The defendants reply will be limited to

21
22

twenty-five pages.
However, the Court notes that it is unaware of a standing order limiting replies to 10

23
24

pages.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2
3

Good cause having been presented to the Court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to
the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is limited to twenty-five pages.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:

May 2, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2