Vlasich v. Nareddy et al

Filing 65

ORDER for Defendants' Counsel to Arrange for Plaintiff's Participation in the Rescheduled Conference and for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why he should not be Sanctioned for Failure to Appear; Show Cause Response due by 12/6/2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/15/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 9 ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL TO ARRANGE FOR PLAINTIFF’S PARTICIPATION IN THE RESCHEDULED CONFERENCE AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR Plaintiff, 7 8 Case No. 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG (PC) STEVEN VLASICH, v. DR. C. NAREDDY and DR. O. BEREGOVSKAYA, Defendants. 10 11 12 Steven Vlasich (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 13 with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court attempted to hold a 14 telephonic scheduling conference on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 64). Counsel Jennifer 15 Marquez telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. Plaintiff failed to appear. 16 The Court has rescheduled the conference to December 12, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. (Id.). 17 Counsel for Defendants shall contact Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to arrange for 18 Plaintiff’s participation in this conference. Additionally, Plaintiff will be required to explain why he did not participate in the 19 20 conference. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. Counsel for Defendants shall contact Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to 22 arrange for Plaintiff’s participation in the rescheduled conference; and 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue for his failure 2 to attend the telephonic scheduling conference. Plaintiff has until December 6, 3 2017, to file a written response explaining why he did not attend the conference. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 15, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?