Vlasich v. Nareddy et al
Filing
65
ORDER for Defendants' Counsel to Arrange for Plaintiff's Participation in the Rescheduled Conference and for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why he should not be Sanctioned for Failure to Appear; Show Cause Response due by 12/6/2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/15/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
9
ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL
TO ARRANGE FOR PLAINTIFF’S
PARTICIPATION IN THE RESCHEDULED
CONFERENCE AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT
BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO
APPEAR
Plaintiff,
7
8
Case No. 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG (PC)
STEVEN VLASICH,
v.
DR. C. NAREDDY and DR. O.
BEREGOVSKAYA,
Defendants.
10
11
12
Steven Vlasich (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
13
with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court attempted to hold a
14
telephonic scheduling conference on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 64). Counsel Jennifer
15
Marquez telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. Plaintiff failed to appear.
16
The Court has rescheduled the conference to December 12, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. (Id.).
17
Counsel for Defendants shall contact Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to arrange for
18
Plaintiff’s participation in this conference.
Additionally, Plaintiff will be required to explain why he did not participate in the
19
20
conference.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. Counsel for Defendants shall contact Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to
22
arrange for Plaintiff’s participation in the rescheduled conference; and
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue for his failure
2
to attend the telephonic scheduling conference. Plaintiff has until December 6,
3
2017, to file a written response explaining why he did not attend the conference.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
November 15, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?