Vlasich v. Nareddy et al

Filing 87

ORDER DENYING 77 Motion in Limine WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff re-filing the motion after the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/9/18. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEVEN VLASICH,

12

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:13-cv-00326-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION IN LIMINE,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

13

15
16

(ECF NO. 77)

v.

14

DR. C. NAREDDY and DR. O.
BEREGOVSKAYA,
Defendants.

17
18

Steven Vlasich (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

19

with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 26, 2018, Plaintiff

20

filed a motion in limine. (ECF No. 77).

21

The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion in limine, without prejudice, because he filed it

22

prematurely. A Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is currently set for October 17, 2018. At

23

the hearing, and/or in the pretrial order, the assigned district judge will address the procedures and

24

timeline for filing and resolving motions in limine. Plaintiff should not file motions in limine

25

prior to the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion in limine is DENIED, without
prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing the motion after the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 9, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2