Luckey v. Visalia Unified School District

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 29 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/27/2014. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TIMOTHY LUCKEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:13-cv-00332-AWI-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

v.
VISALIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

ECF NO. 29, 30
15

Defendant.

16
17

On April 29, 2014, Plaintiff Timothy Luckey (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary

18 judgment. (ECF No. 29.) On May 23, 2014, the magistrate judge assigned to this action issued a
19 Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be
20 denied. (ECF No. 30.)
21

The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed

22 within thirty (30) days. On June 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections to
23 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” However, therein, Plaintiff acknowledges
24 that he does not fully understand the Court’s local rules and procedures and “Completely
25 Understand The Findings And Recommendations Given To Me By This Court.” (Obj. to
26 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations 1:18-19.) Plaintiff’s filing does not set forth
27 any legal objection to the Findings and Recommendation and instead consists of a recitation of
28 facts by Plaintiff and a copy of an employment evaluation.

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

1

2 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
3 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

The May 23, 2014 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

6

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.1

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated: June 27, 2014

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

The Court reminds the parties of the scheduling conference that is set for 9:45 a.m. on August 19, 2014, before the

28 Magistrate Judge. See Doc. No. 27.

2