Luckey v. Visalia Unified School District
Filing
52
ORDER Adopting 50 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/31/2015. ; (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY LUCKEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 1:13-cv-00332-AWI-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
VISALIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
ECF NO. 47, 50
15
Defendant.
16
17
On February 5, 2015, Plaintiff Timothy Luckey (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for summary
18 judgment. (ECF No. 47.) On February 24, 2015, the magistrate judge assigned to this action
19 issued a Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary
20 judgment be denied. (ECF No. 50.)
21
The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed
22 within thirty (30) days. On March 11, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections to
23 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” However, therein, Plaintiff acknowledges
24 that he does not fully understand the Court’s local rules and procedures. Plaintiff’s filing does
25 not set forth any legal objection to the Findings and Recommendation and instead consists of a
26 recitation of facts by Plaintiff and an excerpt from a deposition transcript.
27
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
28 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
1
1 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
FULL; and
4
5
The February 24, 2015 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED (ECF No. 47).
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: March 31, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?