Chavez v. Kings County et al

Filing 65

ORDER on Defendant's 63 Notice Declining Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/9/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JUAN CHAVEZ, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No. 1:13-cv-00342-SKO (PC) v. KINGS COUNTY, et al., 13 ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S NOTICE DECLINING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION (Doc. 63) Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff, Juan Chavez, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights 16 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 16, 2010. This action for damages is proceeding 17 on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Castro for excessive force in violation of the Eighth 18 Amendment for an incident that occurred during the quelling of a prison riot on March 27, 2012. 19 Both parties consented to jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 19, 25.) This 20 action is currently scheduled for trial before the undersigned on July 9, 2017. (Doc. 62.) On 21 January 4, 2017, Defendant filed a form indicating that he now declines jurisdiction of United 22 States Magistrate Judge which is construed as a motion to revoke his consent to Magistrate Judge 23 jurisdiction. (Doc. 63.) 24 Once a civil case is referred to a Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), it can be 25 withdrawn only Afor good cause shown on its own motion, or under extraordinary circumstances 26 shown by any party.@ Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993). Defendant has made no 27 such showing. His motion is, therefore, denied. 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion regarding jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge, filed on January 4, 2017, is hereby DENIED. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2017 /s/ 6 Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?