Patten v. Walker et al

Filing 23

ORDER Regarding Motion at Docket 22 , signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/4/15: The Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal at Docket 22 is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with a copy of this Order, to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for such further consideration as that court may deem appropriate. (Hellings, J)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JASON PATTEN,
Case No. 1:13-cv-00346-RRB
Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER REGARDING MOTION
AT DOCKET 22

J. WALKER,et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 22 Plaintiff Jason Patten, a former California state prisoner, has moved
the Court to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.1 The record in this case reveals that the
Court revoked Patten’s in forma pauperis status.2 Nothing in Patten’s motion compels the
Court to reconsider its prior decisions. Any further relief must be obtained from the Court
of Appeals.
Accordingly, the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal at Docket 22
is DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the Request to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis, together with a copy of this Order, to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit for such further consideration as that court may deem appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2015
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

USCA Case Number 15-16701.

2

Dockets 16, 18.