Moore v. Abby Arco, Inc. et al

Filing 15

Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/11/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

RONALD MOORE,

) Case No. 1:13-cv-00365-LJO-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiff,
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
ABBY ARCO, INC., a California corporation, )
)
dba ARCO #54453; JARNAIL SINGH;
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff RONALD MOORE and

19

Defendants ABBY ARCO, INC., a California corporation, dba ARCO #54453, and JARNAIL

20

SINGH, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to

21

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with

22

prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

23
24

Date: June 11, 2013

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26
27
28

/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Ronald Moore
Moore v. Abby Arco, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 1

1

Date: June 11, 2013

2
3

/s/ Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson
Attorneys for Defendants,
Abby Arco, Inc., a California corporation, dba
ARCO #54453, and Jarnail Singh

4
5

ORDER

6
7

The parties having so stipulated,

8

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

9

The clerk is directed to close this action.

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
Dated:

15

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 11, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

16

66h44d

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Moore v. Abby Arco, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 2