Hovanski v. King, et al.

Filing 29

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Opposition Or Statement Of Non-Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment Within Twenty-One Days (Doc. 25 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/11/2014.(Opposition to Motion Deadline: 7/7/2014) (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THOMAS DANIEL HOVANSKI,
Plaintiff,

14
15

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN
TWENTHY-ONE DAYS

Defendant.

12
13

Case No. 1:13-cv-00377-LJO-JLT (PC)

(Doc. 25)

v.
WALLACE,

16
17

Plaintiff, Thomas D. Hovanski, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18

in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on the First Amended

19

Complaint against Defendant Lauren Wallace for violation of Plaintiff's rights under the

20

Fourteenth Amendment. (Docs. 10, 11.)

21

On May 2, 2014, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 25.) On May 7,

22

2014, a second informational order issued advising Plaintiff of the requirements to oppose a

23

motion for summary judgment and directing Plaintiff to file an opposition or a statement of non-

24

opposition within 21 days. (Doc. 26.) More than 21 days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed

25

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).

26

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within

28

21 days from the date of service of this order; and

1

1
2

2. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal
of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 11, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2