Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance v. Strongtower Financial Inc. et al
Filing
115
ORDER Dismissing Defendant Kathleen A. Garrett From This Action, ORDER Directing The Clerk To Terminate Kathleen A. Garrett On The Docket, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/14/2014. Kathleen A. Garrett (and individual) terminated. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY
Case No. 1:13-CV-00383-LJO-BAM
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
KATHLEEN A. GARRETT FROM
THIS ACTION
STRONGTOWER FINANCIAL INC., a
California Corporation; DEANNA L.
BUCHHOLZ, an individual; ERIC
HIRSCHFIELD, an individual; JAMES WINTER
an individual; KATHERINE S. WESTLAKE an
individual; RAYMOND K. JONES an individual; ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
TERMINATE KATHLEEN A.
ANA GONZALEZ, an individual and trustee of
GARRETT ON THE DOCKET
Gonzalez Trust UAD 5-29-07 and the Estate of
Cesar T. Gonzalez; VICTOR MICHELS, an
individual, JEFFREY S. RAYNES, an individual
and as trustee of the Jeffrey S. Raynes Defined
Benefit and 401K Profit Sharing Plan and Trust;
RANDI ARMSTRONG, an individual, AND
KATHERINE A. GARRETT, an individual; and
DOES 1-250
19
Defendants
20
21
Pursuant to the stipulation filed on November 14, 2014 (Doc. 113) between Plaintiff
22
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, and Defendant Kathleen A. Garret, Defendant
23
Kathleen A. Garret is dismissed from this action without prejudice under Fed. R. of Civ. P.
24
41(a)(l)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of the Court
25
is directed to terminate Kathleen A. Garret on the docket.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
November 14, 2014
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?