Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance v. Strongtower Financial Inc. et al

Filing 129

ORDER granting 128 Stipulation of Dismissal of Action as to Defendants, Jeffrey S. Raynes and Randi Armstrong signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/14/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:13-CV-00383-LJO-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS TO DEFENDANTS JEFFREY S. RAYNES STRONGTOWER FINANCIAL INC., a AND RANDI ARMSTRONG California Corporation; DEANNA L. BUCHHOLZ, an individual; ERIC HIRSCHFIELD, an individual; JAMES WINTER an individual; KATHERINE S. WESTLAKE an individual; RAYMOND K. JONES an individual; ANA GONZALEZ, an individual and trustee of Gonzalez Trust UAD 5-29-07 and the Estate of Cesar T. Gonzalez; VICTOR MICHELS, an individual, JEFFREY S. RAYNES, an individual and as trustee of the Jeffrey S. Raynes Defined Benefit and 401K Profit Sharing Plan and Trust; RANDI ARMSTRONG, an individual, AND KATHERINE A. GARRETT, an individual; and DOES 1-250 v. 16 Defendants. 17 18 Based on the stipulation filed on January 14, 2015 (Doc. 128) between Plaintiff 19 Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company and Defendants Jeffrey Raynes, an individual 20 and as trustee of the Jeffrey S. Raynes Defined Benefit and 401K Profit Sharing Plan and Trust 21 and Randi Armstrong, IT IS SO ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice 22 as to these defendants only under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear its own 23 attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Jeffrey S. Raynes and 24 Randi Armstrong on the docket. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?