Hill v. Clark et al

Filing 69

ORDER Addressing Plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal of 66 Motion for Sanctions and Settlement; ORDER Withdrawing Motion from Court's Calendar signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/17/2015. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 1:13-cv-00386-EPG-PC JONATHAN HILL, ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND SETTLEMENT (ECF No. 58.) Plaintiff, vs. 14 C/O J. CLARK, and 15 C/O A. RIVAS, 16 ORDER WITHDRAWING MOTION FROM COURT’S CALENDAR (ECF No. 66.) Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Jonathan Hill (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights 22 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is scheduled for trial before Magistrate Judge 23 Erica P. Grosjean on April 12, 2016.1 24 On December 3, 2015, Plaintiff, on his own behalf, filed a motion for sanctions and 25 settlement. (ECF No. 66.) On December 7, 2015, Plaintiff, through counsel, filed a notice of 26 27 28 1 The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), and on August 10, 2015, this case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean for all further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment. (ECF No. 45.) 1 1 withdrawal of the motion, in light of the fact that he is now represented by counsel. 2 (ECF No. 2 68.) The Court finds good cause to withdraw the motion from the Court’s calendar. 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions and settlement, filed on December 3, 2015, is WITHDRAWN from the Court’s calendar. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2015 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 On November 23, 2015, the Court appointed Douglas L. Gordon and Aida S. Macedo of Miles, Sears & Eanni to represent Plaintiff. (ECF No. 64.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?