Grimes v. Biter, et al.

Filing 23

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 09/10/14. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 JOSEPH GRIMES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. BITER, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13cv00393 DLB PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Document 22) 16 Plaintiff Joseph Grimes (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on March 18, 2013.1 Pursuant to Court order, Plaintiff filed 19 a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 2, 2013. Plaintiff filed a Second Amended 20 Complaint (“SAC”) as of right on March 13, 2014. On August 13, 2014, the Court screened 21 Plaintiff’s SAC and dismissed it without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. 22 On August 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). 24 The Court denied the motion on September 2, 2014. 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on June 3, 2013. 1 1 2 3 4 On September 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order setting forth the same arguments. At the time Plaintiff signed the motion, he did not have the benefit of the Court’s first ruling. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the Court’s September 5 9, 2014, order. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: /s/ Dennis September 10, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?