Grimes v. Biter, et al.
Filing
23
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 09/10/14. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
JOSEPH GRIMES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
BITER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:13cv00393 DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
(Document 22)
16
Plaintiff Joseph Grimes (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on March 18, 2013.1 Pursuant to Court order, Plaintiff filed
19
a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 2, 2013. Plaintiff filed a Second Amended
20
Complaint (“SAC”) as of right on March 13, 2014. On August 13, 2014, the Court screened
21
Plaintiff’s SAC and dismissed it without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.
22
On August 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to
23
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e).
24
The Court denied the motion on September 2, 2014.
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on June 3, 2013.
1
1
2
3
4
On September 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order
setting forth the same arguments. At the time Plaintiff signed the motion, he did not have the
benefit of the Court’s first ruling.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the Court’s September
5
9, 2014, order.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
September 10, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?