Grimes v. Biter, et al.

Filing 35

ORDER regarding In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal re 33 USCA Notice signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/15/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 JOSEPH GRIMES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. BITER, et al., 15 Defendants. ) 1:13cv00393 DLB PC ) ) ) ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA ) PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL ) ) ) ) ) 16 Plaintiff Joseph Grimes (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action on March 18, 2013.1 On August 13, 2014, the Court 19 screened Plaintiff’s SAC and dismissed it without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. 20 The Court also entered judgment on April 13, 2014. 21 On October 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. 22 On October 14, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred the matter back to this 23 Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue 24 25 for the appeal, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on June 3, 2013. 1 1 2 The Court finds that this appeal is not taken in bad faith and is not frivolous. Accordingly, in forma pauperis status should not be revoked and should continue on appeal. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 /s/ Dennis October 15, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?