Xerox Corporation v. Simply Smashing, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 6/25/2013 to 8/27/2013 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 6/13/2013. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 ROBERT L. POLLAK, State Bar Number 083950 GLASSBERG, POLLAK & ASSOCIATES 425 California Street, Suite 850 San Francisco, CA 94104-2193 (415) 291-8320 phone (415) 291-8111 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Our File No.: 122234 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, hereby requests that the Scheduling 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. SIMPLY SMASHING, INC., a corporation, Defendants. CASE NO: 1:13-CV-00395-LJO-SAB STIPULATION CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Date: June 25, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. Ctrm: #9 (6th Floor) 15 Conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9, be continued to 16 August 27, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. or for such time as the Court deems proper. 17 This is an uncontested matter. On June 5, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for 18 entry of judgment. Judgment will be entered as soon as the amount of pre-judgment interest and 19 attorneys’ fees are determined. These amounts will be determined shortly and judgment will 20 follow thereafter. 21 Because a Scheduling Conference will not be needed in this case, Plaintiff requests that the 22 Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. be continued to August 23 27, 2013 at 2:30 p.m., or for such time as the Court deems proper, to allow for the default 24 judgment to be entered. 25 1 Dated: June 13, 2013 GLASSBERG, POLLAK & ASSOCIATES 2 BY /s/ ROBERT L. POLLAK ROBERT L. POLLAK Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 June 13, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?