Xerox Corporation v. Simply Smashing, Inc.
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 6/25/2013 to 8/27/2013 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 6/13/2013. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
ROBERT L. POLLAK, State Bar Number 083950
GLASSBERG, POLLAK & ASSOCIATES
425 California Street, Suite 850
San Francisco, CA 94104-2193
(415) 291-8320 phone
(415) 291-8111 fax
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
Our File No.: 122234
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation,
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
14
Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, hereby requests that the Scheduling
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
SIMPLY SMASHING, INC., a corporation,
Defendants.
CASE NO: 1:13-CV-00395-LJO-SAB
STIPULATION CONTINUING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
Date: June 25, 2013
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Ctrm: #9 (6th Floor)
15
Conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9, be continued to
16
August 27, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. or for such time as the Court deems proper.
17
This is an uncontested matter. On June 5, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for
18
entry of judgment. Judgment will be entered as soon as the amount of pre-judgment interest and
19
attorneys’ fees are determined. These amounts will be determined shortly and judgment will
20
follow thereafter.
21
Because a Scheduling Conference will not be needed in this case, Plaintiff requests that the
22
Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. be continued to August
23
27, 2013 at 2:30 p.m., or for such time as the Court deems proper, to allow for the default
24
judgment to be entered.
25
1
Dated: June 13, 2013
GLASSBERG, POLLAK & ASSOCIATES
2
BY /s/ ROBERT L. POLLAK
ROBERT L. POLLAK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
June 13, 2013
_
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?