Tucker v. Cline, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD PC) to Fresno (1:13-cv-0400 BAM PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/18/2013. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GERALD L. TUCKER,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:13-cv-0279 KJM DAD P

vs.
PHILLIP CLINE et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant

17

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his

18

complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations

19

took place in Tulare County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District

20

Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

21

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in

22

the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper

23

division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the

24

court.

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern

3

District of California sitting in Fresno; and

4
5

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and
shall be filed at:

6

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

7
8
9

DATED: March 18, 2013.

10
11
12
13

DAD:9
tuck0279.22

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2