Gutierrez v. Gutierrez

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/15/2017 setting Telephonic Trial Conference Hearing on 6/22/2017 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 G. J. GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 A. GUTIERREZ, Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00421-SAB (PC) ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING ON JUNE 22, 2017, AT 2:30 P.M. 18 Plaintiff G. J. Gutierrez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented 20 to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 5, 117); Local Rule 302. 21 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant A. Gutierrez for excessive force 22 and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising out of events on January 14, 2012 23 at Pleasant Valley State Prison. On June 15, 2017, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s 24 motion for summary judgment, in its entirety. (ECF No. 121). Therefore, this case is ready to be 25 scheduled for jury trial before the undersigned. In the interest of accommodating the parties’ schedules, the Court will hold a telephonic 26 27 hearing for scheduling purposes. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 p.m., in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned; and 2. 4 5 A telephonic scheduling hearing will be held on Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 2:30 Defense Counsel shall contact Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at (559) 499- 5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the conference call. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 15, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?