Gutierrez v. Gutierrez
Filing
32
ORDER STRIKING Inmate William Milton's Response as Improper Filing 30 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/13/14. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
G. J. GUTIERREZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
1:13-cv-00421-GSA-PC
ORDER STRIKING INMATE WILLIAM
MILTON’S RESPONSE AS IMPROPER
FILING
(Doc. 30.)
A. GUTIERREZ,
15
Defendant.
16
17
G. J. Gutierrez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
18
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This case now proceeds on the initial
19
Complaint filed by Plaintiff on March 22, 2013, against defendant Correctional Officer A.
20
Gutierrez (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force and failure to protect Plaintiff. (Doc. 1.)
21
On July 31, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to strike Plaintiff’s opposition to
22
Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 28.) On August 1, 2014, the court issued an order
23
granting Defendant’s motion to strike, and striking Plaintiff’s opposition for lack of signature.
24
(Doc. 29.)
25
On August 11, 2014, inmate William Milton, a non-party to this action, filed a response
26
to Defendant’s motion to strike, in which he informs the court that he is assisting Plaintiff with
27
this case and opposes the motion to strike. (Doc. 30.)
28
///
1
A non-lawyer may not represent anyone but himself or herself in court. Johns v.
2
County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997); C. E. Pope Equity Trust v. United
3
States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which
4
signifies that Plaintiff is acting as his own attorney in the litigation of this action. While inmate
5
Milton is not precluded from assisting other inmates with litigation, Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S.
6
817, 823, 97 S.Ct 1491 (1977), he may not, as a non-lawyer, represent anyone but himself in
7
court and may not file documents in this action on Plaintiff’s behalf, or on his own behalf as a
8
non-party litigant. Plaintiff may not designate a non-lawyer to substitute as his attorney-in fact.
9
Therefore, inmate William Milton’s response to Defendant’s motion to strike was improperly
10
filed and shall be stricken from the record.1
11
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that inmate William Milton’s response to
12
Defendant’s motion to strike, filed on August 11, 2014, is STRICKEN from the record as
13
improperly filed.
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 13, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
When a document is stricken, it becomes a nullity and is not considered by the court for any purpose.
(Informational Order, Doc. 3 at 2 fn.1.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?