Brandstatt v. California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility, et al.
Filing
11
ORDER to COMPLY signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/18/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM HUBERT LLOYD
BRANDSTATT,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:13-cv-00434-RRB
ORDER
vs.
DR. ANTHONY ENENMOH, C.M.O, et
al.,
Defendants.
At Docket 10 Plaintiff William Hubert Lloyd Brandstatt, a state prisoner appearing pro
se, responded to this Court’s Order at Docket 9 directing Brandstadtt to file a new motion
to proceed in forma pauperis, including a certified copy of his prison trust account
statement. In his response Brandstadtt attaches a CDCR 22 “Inmate/Parolee Request for
Interview, of Service” requesting a trust account statement. The Staff Response section to
that request states: “Your certified statement has been forwarded to litigations and will be
delivered to your counselor.” Although it appears that Brandstadtt requested that the
statement be sent to this Court, it is the policy of neither the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation or this Court that IFP documents be submitted by the
institution to the Court. The response by CDCR states the form would be delivered to
Brandstadtt’s counselor, which clearly indicates that Brandstadtt is personally responsible
for filing the statement. Furthermore, for proper processing by this Court, it is necessary
ORDER
Brandstatt v. Enemoh, 1:13-cv-00434-RRB - 1
that documents filed with the Clerk be properly identified by a caption containing the names
of the parties and the case number, information that in this case would not be available to
the institution.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before August 29, 2013, Plaintiff must
comply with the Order dated July 9, 2013. Failure to comply with this Order will result
in dismissal of the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2013.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
Brandstatt v. Enemoh, 1:13-cv-00434-RRB - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?