Brandstatt v. California Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER Re Motion At Docket No. 6 , signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 6/13/2013. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis at Docket No. 6 is STRICKEN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 19, 2013, Plaintiff must comply with the Order dated April 1, 2013, or this matter will be dismissed, without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. (Fahrney, E)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM HUBERT LLOYD
BRANDSTATT,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:13-cv-00434-RRB
ORDER RE MOTION
AT DOCKET NO. 6

vs.
DR. ANTHONY ENENMOH, C.M.O,
et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket No. 6 Plaintiff William Hubert Lloyd Brandstatt a state prisoner appearing
pro se, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On April 2, 2013 this Court served on
Brandstatt an Order to Submit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or pay the filing fee
within 45 days.1 Attached to that Order was an IFP Application form. Brandstatt’s motion
does not comply with that Order. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis at
Docket No. 6 is STRICKEN.

1

Dkt. No. 3.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 19, 2013, Plaintiff must comply
with the Order dated April 1, 2013, or this matter will be dismissed, without prejudice and
without further notice to Plaintiff.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve the Order entered at Docket No. 3 on
Plaintiff together with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of June, 2013.
S/RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER
Brandstatt v. Enemoh, 1:13-cv-00434-RRB - 2