McClintic et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING Defendant United States' Unopposed 23 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/21/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ROBERT McCLINTIC, et al. 12 13 1:13-cv-00439-LJO-GSA Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT UNITED STATES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 23) v. 14 15 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Joseph Robert McClintic, through his guardian ad litem Marlene Hubbell, and 19 Marlene Hubbell, as co-trustee of the Joseph McClintic Living Trust, filed a complaint against 20 defendants the United States Postal Service; Bertha Cervantes, a United States postal carrier; and Does 21 1 through 50. Plaintiffs allege that defendants are liable for Ms. Cervantes’ alleged execution of a 22 “sweetheart swindle scam” against Mr. McClintic in which she conned Mr. McClintic out of 23 approximately $38,000 in gifts and monies. 24 The United States, on behalf of the United States Postal Service, filed a motion to dismiss all 25 claims against it, with prejudice, for failure to establish subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a 26 claim. Plaintiffs filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion. 27 The United States’ unopposed motion to dismiss all claims against it is GRANTED. All claims 28 1 1 against the United States are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter 2 judgment in favor of the United States. The hearing set for July 2, 2013 is VACATED. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 21, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?