Morales v. Vallarta Properties, LLC et al

Filing 10

Stipulation for extension of time for Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. to respond to 2 Complaint and ORDER Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/21/2013. ( Responses due by 6/1/2013) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Manuel Garcia, Esq. (SBN 183535) PEEL | GARCIA LLP 3585 W. Beechwood, Suite 101 Fresno, California 93711 Telephone: (559) 431-1300 Facsimile: (559) 431-1442 4 5 6 Attorneys for: Defendants, VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JOHN MORALES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a ) California limited liability company; ) VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a ) California corporation, dba VALLARTA ) SUPERMARKETS, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 1:13-CV-00440-AWI-SMS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON 18 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff John Morales (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant VALLARTA FOOD 20 ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a 21 22 23 24 California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS (“Defendant”) have agreed that Defendant will have a CASp inspection performed in the next 10 days, after which the parties will try to 25 negotiate a resolution without any further Court intervention. In order to provide the parties with 26 sufficient time to reach a resolution, the parties agree and request that the court extend the time 27 for Defendant to file an Answer to the Complaint. 28 /// 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 1 WHEREAS, this request for extension is the first request made by the parties. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant, 3 through its counsel of record, and Plaintiff, through his counsel of record, that pursuant to 4 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b), Defendant may have up to, and including, June 1, 2013, to 5 6 file a responsive pleading. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 8 Dated: April 18, 2013 PEEL | GARCIA LLP 9 By: 10 11 12 13 /s/ Manuel Garcia _____________________ Manuel Garcia, Attorney for, Defendants, VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS 14 15 Dated: April 18, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 16 By: 17 18 19 /// 20 /// 21 _/s/ Tanya E. Moore______________________ Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for, Plaintiff, NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ /// 22 /// 23 24 25 /// /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant 4 VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA 5 6 PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD 7 ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS 8 (“Defendant”) to Respond to Complaint be granted. Defendant may have up to, and including, 9 June 1, 2013, to file a responsive pleading. 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 15 April 21, 2013 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 DEAC_Signature-END: icido34h 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?