Morales v. Vallarta Properties, LLC et al
Filing
10
Stipulation for extension of time for Defendant Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. to respond to 2 Complaint and ORDER Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/21/2013. ( Responses due by 6/1/2013) (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
Manuel Garcia, Esq. (SBN 183535)
PEEL | GARCIA LLP
3585 W. Beechwood, Suite 101
Fresno, California 93711
Telephone:
(559) 431-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 431-1442
4
5
6
Attorneys for: Defendants, VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and
sued as VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company;
VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA
SUPERMARKETS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JOHN MORALES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a
)
California limited liability company;
)
VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a )
California corporation, dba VALLARTA
)
SUPERMARKETS,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No. 1:13-CV-00440-AWI-SMS
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT VALLARTA
FOOD
ENTERPRISES,
INC.
TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
ORDER THEREON
18
19
WHEREAS, Plaintiff John Morales (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant VALLARTA FOOD
20
ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA PROPERTIES, LLC, a
21
22
23
24
California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California
Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS (“Defendant”) have agreed that Defendant
will have a CASp inspection performed in the next 10 days, after which the parties will try to
25
negotiate a resolution without any further Court intervention. In order to provide the parties with
26
sufficient time to reach a resolution, the parties agree and request that the court extend the time
27
for Defendant to file an Answer to the Complaint.
28
///
1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
1
WHEREAS, this request for extension is the first request made by the parties.
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant,
3
through its counsel of record, and Plaintiff, through his counsel of record, that pursuant to
4
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b), Defendant may have up to, and including, June 1, 2013, to
5
6
file a responsive pleading.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
Dated: April 18, 2013
PEEL | GARCIA LLP
9
By:
10
11
12
13
/s/ Manuel Garcia _____________________
Manuel Garcia, Attorney for,
Defendants, VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES,
INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA
PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company; VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES,
INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA
SUPERMARKETS
14
15
Dated: April 18, 2013
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
16
By:
17
18
19
///
20
///
21
_/s/ Tanya E. Moore______________________
Tanya E. Moore, Attorney for,
Plaintiff, NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ
///
22
///
23
24
25
///
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant
4
VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC., erroneously served and sued as VALLARTA
5
6
PROPERTIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; VALLARTA FOOD
7
ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation, dba VALLARTA SUPERMARKETS
8
(“Defendant”) to Respond to Complaint be granted. Defendant may have up to, and including,
9
June 1, 2013, to file a responsive pleading.
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
15
April 21, 2013
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
DEAC_Signature-END:
icido34h
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?