Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al
Filing
10
ORDER vacating hearing date of July 1, 2013 and taking matter under submission. signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/26/13. (Nazaroff, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELTON W. ERVIN,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 1:13cv0446 AWI GSA
Plaintiff,
v.
MERCED POLICE DEPT.; MERCED
POLICE OFFICERS E. CHAVEZ,
APONTE, SAKYER, and PADGETT,
and DOES 1 to 4,,
ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF
JULY1, 2013 AND TAKING MATTER
UNDER SUBMISSION
Defendants.
18
In this action for damages, defendants Merced Police Department, et al.
19
20
21
(“Defendants”) have noticed a motion to dismiss claims from the First Amended
Complaint of plaintiff Elton W. Ervin (“Plaintiff”). The matter was scheduled for oral
argument to be held July 1, 2013 The Court has reviewed defendants’ motion.
22
Opposition, which was due not later than June 21, 2013, was not filed as of that date
23
and consequently the motion may not be opposed at oral argument. Local Rule 7824
230(b). The court has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral
25
argument. Local Rule 78-230(h).
26
27
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of July
28
1
1
1, 2013, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of July 1, 2013, the
2
Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 26, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
7
8
0m8i788
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?