Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al

Filing 104

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk's Office to Seal Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/29/15. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104

ALLEN. GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

8

FRESNO COURTHOUSE

11

ELTON W. ERVIN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 1:13-cv-00446-GSA

v.
MERCED POLICE DEPT., OFFICERS:
#1 (E. CHAVEZ – BADGE #’S 156 #2.
(Sgt. APONTE-UNKNOWN #3
(SALYER - # 191 #4 PADGETT – 180
DOES 1 TO 4,,

17

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK’S
OFFICE TO SEAL DOCUMENTS

Defendants.

18
19

Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 141(b), Defendants CITY OF MERCED (sued

20

herein as MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT), OFFICER E. CHAVEZ, SGT. APONTE,

21

OFFICER SALYERS, and OFFICER PADGETT (“Defendants”) submitted a Request to seal

22

documents that were produced in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 93, Exhibit

23

F). These documents were produced to Plaintiff and are subject to a protective order signed by

24

this Court, and were filed in response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. (Docs. 86 and

25

87).

26

Given the above, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file documents Bates-stamped

27

“M000009-000036” under seal, which are documents related to Defendants’ Opposition to

28
1
56870.1

1:13-CV-00446-GSA

1

Plaintiff’s Motion for Additional Discovery. (Doc. 93, Exhibit F). After sealing the documents,

2

the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and copies of the sealed documents

3

on Plaintiff at his address listed on the docket.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 29, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104

ALLEN. GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

8

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

56870.1

1:13-CV-00446-GSA