Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al
Filing
104
ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk's Office to Seal Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/29/15. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN. GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
FRESNO COURTHOUSE
11
ELTON W. ERVIN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:13-cv-00446-GSA
v.
MERCED POLICE DEPT., OFFICERS:
#1 (E. CHAVEZ – BADGE #’S 156 #2.
(Sgt. APONTE-UNKNOWN #3
(SALYER - # 191 #4 PADGETT – 180
DOES 1 TO 4,,
17
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK’S
OFFICE TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
Defendants.
18
19
Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 141(b), Defendants CITY OF MERCED (sued
20
herein as MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT), OFFICER E. CHAVEZ, SGT. APONTE,
21
OFFICER SALYERS, and OFFICER PADGETT (“Defendants”) submitted a Request to seal
22
documents that were produced in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 93, Exhibit
23
F). These documents were produced to Plaintiff and are subject to a protective order signed by
24
this Court, and were filed in response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. (Docs. 86 and
25
87).
26
Given the above, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file documents Bates-stamped
27
“M000009-000036” under seal, which are documents related to Defendants’ Opposition to
28
1
56870.1
1:13-CV-00446-GSA
1
Plaintiff’s Motion for Additional Discovery. (Doc. 93, Exhibit F). After sealing the documents,
2
the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and copies of the sealed documents
3
on Plaintiff at his address listed on the docket.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 29, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN. GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
56870.1
1:13-CV-00446-GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?