Ervin v. Merced Police Dept. et al
Filing
53
ORDER Directing the Clerk to Send a Copy of the Complaint to Plaintiff re 52 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/18/2014. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ELTON W. ERVIN,
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
1:13-cv-00446 GSA
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
SEND A COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO
PLAINTIFF
(Doc. 52)
MERCED POLICE DEPARTMENT et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff Elton Ervin filed a motion requesting a copy of the complaint he filed in the
18
Merced County Superior Court to initiate this action, which was subsequently removed to this
19
Court by Defendants. Doc. 52. The Court grants Plaintiff’s request in this instance, however
20
Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk ordinarily does not provide free copies of case documents to
21
22
parties. As noted in the First Informational Order issued on March 27, 2013, “[t]he court cannot
provide copy or mailing service for a party,” free of charge. (Doc. 3-2 at 2). Upon written
23
24
25
request and prepayment of fees, copies of documents in the court file may be obtained from the
Clerk at the cost of $ 0.50 per page. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1914(c).
26
27
28
1
1
In this instance, in light of Plaintiff’s explanation that his legal documents were misplaced
2
by prison authorities when he was moved from one prison facility to another, the Court will make
3
a one-time exception and direct the Clerk to provide a free copy of the complaint to Plaintiff.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
Plaintiff's request for a copy of his complaint is GRANTED; and
7
2.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of the complaint and/or all the
8
documents included in Defendants’ Notice of Removal filed on March 26, 2013. (Doc. 1).
6
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
12
December 18, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?